A Nigerian entrepreneur denied US entry and detained for 24 hours after customs officials checked her social media

[dropcap]A[/dropcap] Nigerian entrepreneur, who prefers to remain anonymous at this time, recently shared a distressing experience of being denied entry into the United States despite possessing a valid visa.

Also read: ‘We will not be represented?!’ Nigeria out of World Relays as athletes are denied visas

She was detained for 24 hours upon arrival and subsequently sent back, a decision she attributes to US officials scrutinising her social media activity, revealing a new frontier in travel scrutiny. This has sparked concern.

The entrepreneur recounted her ordeal in an emotional social media post. She explained that she and her team had meticulously prepared for a trade fair in the US, an endeavour that involved “sleepless nights” of preparation.

However, her plans were abruptly derailed upon landing in the United States. She conveyed her disappointment, stating, “It haunts me to tell you guys that I won’t be there. Because currently, I am on my way back.”

She explained the reason for the denial. Her visa was a B1/B2 visa, typically designated for tourism or business visits.

However, during questioning by US Customs and Border Protection officials, her statements about her purpose of visit, specifically exhibiting at a trade fair, conflicted with information found on her social media pages.

This discrepancy became a critical point of contention during her immigration processing.

“Apparently, I was denied entrance into the US and that’s because my visa was a B1 B2 visa which is tourism slash,” she stated, elaborating on the official reason provided.

She detailed her distressing detention experience: “I was detained for like 24 hours in their detention room.”

During her questioning, she admitted, “I told them that I was just only going to exhibit. But I didn’t know any better because the US has all your data, your Instagram page, every single thing.”

The officials evidently used her online presence as evidence. “So apparently, my Instagram obviously says different because they even checked all my messages with my customers,” she revealed, indicating a deep dive into her personal communications.

These messages, she noted, included exchanges with customers “telling that we’re coming and they can pick up and you know all of that.” This level of scrutiny caught her off guard.

The entrepreneur expressed profound disappointment, especially for her US-based customers. “Long story short, this is actually for my US ladies. God knows I tried,” she conveyed.

She had eagerly anticipated meeting her customers in person. “I really wanted you guys to… experience the person behind the products,” she lamented, highlighting her desire for a personal connection with her clientele.

Despite the significant financial loss incurred due to her preparations and the failed trip, she stated her focus was not on the money.

“And I’m not even thinking about all the money’s lost. Because, I mean, it’s part of life,” she acknowledged, demonstrating resilience. Instead, she appealed to her supporters for continued patronage: “So what you guys do for me is just support me in any way you can.”

Reflecting on the interrogation, she questioned her approach. “I could have just told them the truth even if it means them seizing all my goods like the goods I came with,” she mused.

However, she quickly dismissed any regrets, stating, “But I’ve told myself this is not the time to start regretting. I’ve been on the flight for almost 12 hours now.” Her journey back to Nigeria was long and contemplative.

She framed her ordeal as a test of faith. “I know that this is one of the ways the devil will,” she commented, but maintained her conviction, “But I know that God is aware. And I’ve also learned my lessons.”

Her experience serves as a cautionary tale for others travelling internationally, particularly those with online business presences or public profiles.

This incident underscores the increasing importance of aligning one’s stated purpose of visit with all available digital footprints when applying for and travelling on visas.

Immigration authorities globally are increasingly utilising social media and other online data to verify travel intentions.

This practice can lead to complications if there are perceived inconsistencies, even for legitimate travellers.

The entrepreneur’s public sharing of her experience has resonated with many others who travel internationally for business or personal reasons.

It highlights the potential for misunderstanding when an individual’s online activities, particularly those related to commerce, might be interpreted as exceeding the scope of a standard tourist or visitor visa.

This situation emphasizes strict adherence to visa types.

The case further reinforces the need for individuals to thoroughly understand the specific limitations and permissions associated with their visa categories.

Misinformation or a lack of awareness regarding permissible activities can lead to severe consequences, including detention and immediate deportation, as experienced by this entrepreneur.

The emotional toll of such an event is clearly evident in her statement. Beyond the financial implications, the personal distress of being detained and turned away, after extensive preparations and expectations, is significant.