IPOB proscription declared illegal and politically-motivated, violating Nigerian laws and international charters, according to IPOB’s latest official statement
IPOB proscription has been strongly denounced by the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) as an unconstitutional and politically-driven act, undermining both Nigeria’s judiciary and international human rights charters.
Also read: Nnamdi Kanu UK silence slammed by IPOB as ‘Disgraceful’
In a bold statement, IPOB spokesperson Emma Powerful detailed what he described as “systemic oppression and weaponisation of the law” following the group’s 2017 proscription.
Powerful cited violations of key legal frameworks, including Section 36 and 40 of Nigeria’s Constitution, the African Charter, and the ICCPR.
According to Powerful, the 2017 military raid on IPOB leader Nnamdi Kanu’s home, which resulted in 28 civilian deaths, marked the beginning of a disturbing pattern of repression.
The proscription order itself, obtained ex parte by then-Attorney General Abubakar Malami, was issued without presidential approval a direct breach of Nigeria’s Terrorism Prevention Act.
IPOB asserts that the label of a “terrorist group” has been weaponized for political suppression. “We are a peaceful movement. Our goal is justice, not conflict,” Powerful said.
He appealed to the international community to intervene, condemn the proscription, and monitor Nigeria’s courts to ensure judicial independence.
Also read: IPOB terrorism trial reveals killing of 200 police officers by separatist group
IPOB continues to advocate for a political solution, including a referendum, and vows to persist through lawful and global advocacy.
Quadri Olaitan is a journalist and contributor to Freelanews.com, covering news, public affairs, and human-interest stories.
