The Federal Government has concluded its prosecution in the treason case against IPOB leader Nnamdi Kanu. Defence lawyers will now submit a no-case argument

[dropcap]T[/dropcap]he Federal Government has officially closed its case against Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), who has been held since 2021 on charges including treasonable felony, inciting public disturbance, and running an outlawed group advocating for Biafra’s secession.

Also read: IPOB terrorism trial reveals killing of 200 police officers by separatist group

“The Federal Republic of Nigeria CLOSED its case against Mazi Nnamdi Kanu,” announced his special counsel, Aloy Ejimakor, signalling a critical turning point in the high-profile treason case that has captivated national and international attention.

The development followed a court session on Thursday, where the prosecution, led by Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Adegboyega Awomolo, concluded its arguments after presenting its fifth and final witness.

Following this, Kanu’s lead defence counsel, Kanu Agabi (SAN), notified the court that the legal team would be filing a no-case submission—a legal move asserting that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case warranting a defence.

“The Court granted the defence 14 days to file its written address on a no-case submission and 14 days to the prosecution to respond,” Ejimakor wrote on his verified X account shortly after the hearing.

Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court, Abuja, subsequently adjourned the matter to 18 July 2025 for further proceedings.

The Court granted the defence 14 days to file its written address on a no-case submission and 14 days to the prosecution to respond.

Kanu’s trial, ongoing for several years, has generated widespread attention due to the political and human rights questions it raises.

Supporters argue that his prolonged detention without bail and restricted access to legal representation violate constitutional rights and silence dissent.

The Federal Government, however, maintains that Kanu’s rhetoric and actions have directly contributed to unrest and violence in the South-East, including attacks on security personnel and public infrastructure.

The court’s decision on the no-case submission could significantly impact the trajectory of Nigeria’s security and separatist dynamics.

If upheld, the charges could be dismissed, potentially resulting in Kanu’s release. If denied, the defence will be compelled to open its case.

Also read: IPOB calls for Nnamdi Kanu’s release as prisoner of conscience

Analysts suggest the coming months will test the strength of Nigeria’s judicial system and its ability to balance national security concerns with fundamental civil liberties.