Nigeria’s headline inflation fell to 15.43 per cent in July 2026, but Nigerian households continued to face rising food and living costs as food inflation climbed to 20.31 per cent, exposing the widening gap between improving macroeconomic indicators and the everyday financial pressure experienced by consumers.

The latest figures from the National Bureau of Statistics show that headline inflation declined for a second consecutive month, from 15.91 per cent in June to 15.43 per cent in July.

Also read: Ogogo’s health battle: Doctor sheds light on palliative care

Month-on-month inflation also eased from 1.66 per cent to 1.57 per cent.

The figures may appear encouraging at first glance.

But economists say a lower inflation rate should not be confused with lower prices.

In simple terms, disinflation means prices are increasing at a slower rate. It does not necessarily mean that the prices consumers are paying in markets have fallen.

That distinction is particularly important for food.

While overall inflation eased, food inflation moved in the opposite direction, rising for a sixth consecutive month to 20.31 per cent from 17.52 per cent.

The NBS attributed the increase to higher prices of several commonly consumed items, including rice, tomatoes, onions, pepper, garri, plantain, beef, eggs, ginger and guinea corn.

The pressure is not evenly distributed across the country.

Adamawa recorded the highest headline inflation rate at 33.03 per cent, while Nasarawa posted the lowest at 7.86 per cent.

For food inflation, Adamawa again recorded the highest rate, at 51.36 per cent, compared with 6.88 per cent in Nasarawa.

The sharp regional differences underline how inflation can feel very different depending on where a household lives, what it consumes and how much of its income goes towards essentials.

Dr Okechukwu Unegbu, former President of the Chartered Institute of Bankers of Nigeria, questioned whether the official headline figure adequately captures the economic reality confronting ordinary Nigerians.

“For me, the inflation that is dropping is neither here nor there,” Unegbu told DAILY POST, arguing that his assessment of Nigeria’s inflation remained considerably higher than the official figure.

He estimated inflation in the range of 35 to 40 per cent based on what he described as his own assessment of living costs and market prices.

His estimate is not the official NBS measure, but it reflects the frustration among consumers who continue to encounter elevated prices despite the headline rate declining.

Prof Godwin Oyedokun, a professor of accounting, offered a different interpretation of the figures.

Oyedokun described the second consecutive fall in headline inflation as a potentially positive sign of improving macroeconomic stability, but cautioned that it should not be interpreted as evidence that the cost of living is falling.

“Nigeria’s second consecutive decline in headline inflation to 15.43% in July is a positive sign of emerging macroeconomic stability, but it should not be mistaken for a fall in the cost of living,” he said.

He attributed the moderation partly to relative exchange-rate stability, tighter monetary policy, easing core inflation and favourable base effects.

The International Monetary Fund has similarly linked Nigeria’s recent moderation in inflation to tighter monetary policy and greater exchange-rate stability, while noting that inflation remains high.

The IMF has also highlighted persistent domestic food-price pressures linked to supply constraints and climate-related shocks.

Food prices are particularly difficult to moderate because they are influenced by factors beyond monetary policy.

Farm output, transportation, storage, weather conditions, energy costs, exchange rates and supply-chain disruptions can all affect the price consumers eventually pay.

The IMF has noted that Nigeria’s domestic food prices can diverge significantly from international food-price movements.

It attributed persistent domestic pressures partly to climate-related events, including drought and flooding, which have affected agricultural production.

Dr Muda Yusuf, Chief Executive Officer of the Centre for the Promotion of Private Enterprise, said the moderation in headline inflation reflected improved macroeconomic stability, particularly relative stability in the foreign-exchange market.

But Yusuf stressed that the improvement had yet to resolve the major pressures affecting ordinary households.

He identified food, transportation, energy and utility costs as continuing drivers of the cost-of-living crisis and called for fiscal interventions by both federal and state governments.

“The key drivers of the cost of living are still major pressure points as far as inflationary pressure is concerned,” Yusuf said.

The distinction between inflation and the cost of living helps explain why many Nigerians may not immediately feel relief from the latest headline figure.

If a household was paying significantly more for rice, transport, electricity and other essentials before inflation slowed, a lower inflation rate does not automatically restore those prices to their previous levels.

It only means that the rate at which prices are increasing has moderated.

This is particularly significant in Nigeria, where food accounts for a substantial share of household expenditure.

The IMF has noted that Nigeria’s 2025 inflation rebasing reduced the food component’s weight in the consumer price index to 28 per cent, from 50.7 per cent previously.

That methodological change means headline inflation must be interpreted carefully when assessing the pressure households face from food prices.

For consumers, however, the practical test remains much simpler.

It is whether wages can buy more food, whether transport fares become more manageable and whether essential household expenses stop consuming an increasingly large share of monthly income.

That is why economists say sustaining the downward movement in headline inflation will not be enough on its own.

Oyedokun said the more important test would be whether food prices eventually moderate, purchasing power improves and wages begin to catch up with the elevated cost of living.

Yusuf similarly argued that government intervention would be necessary to address structural pressures affecting food production, transportation, energy and utilities.

The challenge is therefore shifting from simply bringing down the headline inflation rate to ensuring that lower inflation translates into a tangible improvement in household welfare.

Nigeria’s latest figures offer some encouragement on the macroeconomic front.

But with food inflation moving higher and essential expenses remaining elevated, the recovery has yet to reach many household shopping baskets.

For millions of Nigerians, the question is no longer simply whether inflation is falling.