UEFA has changed its penalty kick rule after Julián Álvarez’s disallowed spot-kick for Atlético Madrid against Real Madrid sparked controversy in the Champions League

[dropcap]U[/dropcap]EFA penalty rule change has been officially introduced following a controversial moment during the Champions League shootout between Atlético Madrid and Real Madrid in March, when Julián Álvarez’s spot-kick was disallowed for a ‘double touch’.

Also read: PSG Champions League celebrations turn violent across Paris, two dead, hundreds arrested

Under the previous regulation, a penalty was deemed void if the taker accidentally struck the ball with both feet before it entered the goal.

Álvarez’s effort, which resulted in a goal but was ruled out due to an unintentional second contact, became a major talking point in the aftermath of Atlético Madrid’s elimination from the competition.

In response to the incident and a formal protest lodged by Atlético, UEFA has amended the rule.

From now on, if a penalty taker unintentionally strikes the ball with both feet and scores, the penalty will be retaken rather than automatically disallowed a significant departure from the earlier rule.

“This adjustment brings more justice to the game,” said a UEFA official. “Unintentional errors that lead to goals should not result in such harsh outcomes

The rule change has been welcomed by many fans and analysts as a fairer approach to an uncommon but decisive scenario in elite football.

This development follows sustained pressure on UEFA to revise interpretations of technical infractions that have outsized consequences in knockout stages.

The decision could shape the outcome of future high-stakes penalty shootouts and brings UEFA in line with a more lenient stance seen in other competitions.

Also read: Ousmane Dembele fit for PSG’s Champions League semi-final second leg against Arsenal

As for Julián Álvarez and Atlético Madrid, the ruling comes too late to reverse the outcome of their Champions League campaign, but it sets a precedent that may prevent similar controversies in the future.