UK court links Lord Mayor of Leeds Abigail Katung to suspicious property deposit in £1m money laundering case, prompting forfeiture and public scrutiny

[dropcap]A[/dropcap]bigail Katung money laundering allegations have surfaced following a UK High Court ruling that granted a forfeiture order on a £1 million property linked to the Lord Mayor of Leeds.

Also read: Aisha Achimugu allegedly assaults Channels TV reporter during money laundering trial

The court’s findings implicated Mrs Katung in suspicious financial transactions made in 2015 during the purchase of the property, which was previously owned by Leeds businessman Mansoor Hussain, an individual accused of laundering money for organised crime.

The court focused on the source of £360,000 of a £400,000 deposit made by Mrs Katung, raising serious concerns over the legality of the funds.

Although she told the court the money came from a loan secured by her husband, Nigerian Senator Sunday Katung, and converted through Nigerian Bureau De Change operators, the judge found the explanation inadequate and unsupported by evidence.

In the judgment delivered on 6 June, the court stated that the documents failed to establish a legitimate trail for the funds.

It noted that most of the alleged BDCs were not licensed and that the method used appeared to circumvent Nigerian foreign exchange regulations.

The court also criticised the lack of a witness statement from Senator Katung and the absence of documentation supporting the transactions.

Appointed as Lord Mayor in May 2024, Mrs Katung became the first person of African descent to hold the role in Leeds. Born in Zaria and a British-Nigerian, she arrived in the UK in 2000 for postgraduate study.

Since entering public service, she has held various leadership roles within Leeds City Council and has been a visible figure in the city’s civic life.

Her rise to prominence now faces scrutiny. The National Crime Agency argued successfully that the property, including Mrs Katung’s deposit, represented proceeds of crime.

The court agreed, ordering the full forfeiture of the house without crediting her payments.

Mrs Katung has not provided sufficient documentation or clarification in court. The judge concluded that key omissions in her case, including missing paperwork and her husband’s silence, created an adverse inference.

He noted that the transactions resembled business operations designed to bypass regulations and conceal the source of funds.

Following publication of the judgment, Senator Katung’s office responded by stating that the ruling is under appeal and warned against drawing premature conclusions.

They asserted that both the senator and his wife have always acted within the law and intend to pursue all available legal remedies.