Peter Obi criticism grows after he singles out Lagos for port development while calling for broader national infrastructure investment
Peter Obi criticism has grown increasingly vocal as Nigerians push back on his social media post that condemned the concentration of port modernisation efforts in Lagos.
Also read: Peter Obi defends supporters against “street urchins” insult
In the post, Obi expressed concern that while the federal government approved a substantial US$1 billion (₦1.5 trillion) investment for the Apapa and Tin-Can Island ports, other strategic hubs like Warri, Port Harcourt, Calabar and Onne were being overlooked.
While many accepted the sentiment that infrastructure should be evenly distributed, critics argue that Obi’s framing was misleading and politically charged.
Supporters of the Lagos State Government pointed out that urban planning, port policy and funding involve complex federal-state dynamics which the post failed to address.
For instance, the state government rebuked unrelated claims made by Obi earlier in the year, describing them as “misinformation and disinformation” in the context of the Trade Fair Complex dispute. (Trending News)
Obi’s post referenced global examples of decentralised port systems — Vietnam, Indonesia, South Africa — to stress that no country should concentrate maritime activity in a single city.
He argued that Nigeria’s heavy reliance on Lagos leads to congestion, inflated shipping costs, and regional economic imbalance.
However, many social-media users and commentators contended that the focus on Lagos came across as selective criticism and questioned why Obi targeted one state while remaining silent on other regional infrastructure issues.
Some accused him of using the subject as a political platform rather than a national concern.
Analysts say the episode highlights a broader dilemma for Nigerian leaders: how to speak legitimately about national infrastructure without appearing regional or partisan.
It also underscores the sensitive terrain of federal-state relations, investment allocation and public perception.
Also read: Peter Obi urges swift action on PENGASSAN strike
As the debate continues, Peter Obi criticism seems bound to linger unless he clarifies his motives and offers constructive advocacy for a truly nationwide infrastructure strategy.
