Shell Niger Delta documents reportedly reveal executives approved pipeline operations despite warnings over environmental risks in Nigeria

Newly released internal documents from Shell plc have revealed that senior executives approved the continued operation of oil pipelines in Nigeria’s Niger Delta despite repeated internal warnings from engineers about environmental risks and potential oil spills.

Also read: Shell resumes production at Bonga field after maintenance

The documents, obtained by the BBC amid ongoing class-action proceedings before the English High Court involving the Bille and Ogale communities in Rivers State, include emails, internal reports, memoranda and presentations spanning several years.

According to the records, executives at former parent company Royal Dutch Shell were aware between 2008 and 2013 of widespread oil theft and hundreds of illegal pipeline connections, but allegedly opted to maintain operations in order to minimise disruption to production.

The Shell Niger Delta Documents further indicate that exemptions from internal safety and environmental standards were approved at senior levels, even as technical teams warned of escalating risks linked to continued pipeline activity in affected areas.

In one cited exchange, Ann Pickard, then Executive Vice-President for Sub-Saharan Africa, reportedly acknowledged engineers’ calls for urgent action to remove illegal connections, describing the decision-making process as “not an easy decision,” while stating that continuing operations represented the “lower risk to both people and the environment.”

Vincent Holtam, then general manager for onshore assets at Shell’s Nigerian subsidiary, reportedly cautioned internally that such decisions could “do more harm than good,” warning that audit findings could expose the company to significant liability over oil loss and community compensation claims.

The documents also reference an internal initiative known as “Project Madrid,” which allegedly examined strategies for sustaining production amid widespread crude theft while managing reputational and environmental risks.

One presentation reportedly warned that continued operations could expose the company to allegations of knowingly polluting the environment.

The revelations come as Shell faces legal action in the United Kingdom over alleged environmental damage caused by oil spills in the Niger Delta, with communities arguing that decades of pollution have severely impacted livelihoods, agriculture and local ecosystems.

The Shell Niger Delta Documents also suggest that internal communications considered public relations strategies aimed at emphasising oil theft as a primary cause of pollution while limiting scrutiny of decisions not to fully remove illegal pipeline connections.

Environmental accountability in the Niger Delta has remained a longstanding issue, with the United Nations estimating that millions of barrels of crude oil have been spilled across thousands of incidents in Nigeria since 1958.

The case has drawn renewed attention to decades of activism in the region, including the execution of environmental campaigner Ken Saro-Wiwa and eight other Ogoni leaders in 1995 under the military regime of General Sani Abacha, an episode that triggered international condemnation.

More recently, Nigeria’s President Bola Tinubu has taken steps related to reconciliation efforts in Ogoniland, including national recognition of the executed activists.

Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria Limited was later divested by Shell in 2025 as part of a broader restructuring of its onshore Nigerian operations.

Also read: Shell commits fresh $20bn investment boost for Nigeria

The Shell Niger Delta Documents are expected to remain central to ongoing legal scrutiny as courts examine allegations of environmental harm, corporate oversight and responsibility in one of Africa’s most heavily impacted oil-producing regions.