Tensions soared during a Senate hearing when Senator Onyekachi Nwaebonyi clashed with Oby Ezekwesili over alleged bias and constitutional violations
[dropcap]A[/dropcap] fiery exchange erupted at the Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges, and Public Petitions hearing on Tuesday, between Onyekachi Nwaebonyi, the senator representing Ebonyi North, and former Minister of Education, Oby Ezekwesili.
Also read: Senate vows sanctions for MDAs over auditor general’s report
The clash occurred during the review of a fresh petition submitted by Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, the chief petitioner from Kogi Central.
The trouble began when Akpoti-Uduaghan’s legal representative, Abiola Akiyode-Afolabi, urged the Chairman of the Committee, Senator Neda Imasuen, to step down from the case.
The petitioners argued that Imasuen had publicly expressed opinions on the sexual harassment allegations against former Senate President Godswill Akpabio, which, they claimed, tainted his neutrality.
Zubairu Yakubu, one of the petitioners, pointed out that some committee members had close ties to Akpabio, raising concerns that this compromised their impartiality in addressing the allegations.
“How can the chairman serve as a judge in a case where he has already publicly taken a position?” Yakubu questioned, adding that it seemed pointless to present their case when a verdict appeared to have already been passed.
His statements sparked a fierce reaction from some senators, who accused him of attempting to discredit the committee’s credibility.
The situation escalated when Ezekwesili, who was also present at the hearing alongside the petitioners, insisted on being heard. Despite her demand to be sworn in as a witness, the request was met with strong opposition from Senator Nwaebonyi.
The verbal altercation between Nwaebonyi and Ezekwesili became particularly intense, with the senator lashing out at Ezekwesili, calling her “a fool” and an “insult to womanhood.”
Ezekwesili, in turn, referred to him as a “hooligan,” further escalating the confrontation. The clash briefly disrupted the hearing, with members of the Senate Committee scrambling to restore order.
In the wake of the confrontation, Senator Patrick Ndubueze, representing Imo West, appealed for calm, reminding the committee that they were in the Senate, not a marketplace.
He addressed the petitioners, emphasising that the Senate must follow proper procedures, and that a petitioner must be recognised before speaking.
Despite the turmoil, Chairman Imasuen eventually adjourned the hearing indefinitely. The decision followed concerns about the pending legal cases involving Akpabio’s wife and Akpoti-Uduaghan, as well as the absence of Akpoti-Uduaghan from the hearing.
After the hearing, Ezekwesili addressed the media, denouncing the Senate’s handling of the situation. She criticised the committee for prioritising Senate rules over constitutional provisions, particularly in cases that involve serious petitions and disciplinary actions. She argued that the committee’s approach was a direct violation of the Nigerian Constitution.
“The Senate continues to place its own rules above the Constitution, which is unacceptable in a democracy,” Ezekwesili remarked. She also pointed to the suspension of Akpoti-Uduaghan, which she claimed was executed without adhering to constitutional processes.
Ezekwesili raised further alarm over the potential dangers of allowing Senate rules to override constitutional rights. She warned that this could set a dangerous precedent where powerful individuals use internal rules to suppress justice and stifle opposition.
The ongoing clash between the Senate and the petitioners raises significant questions about the independence of Nigeria’s legislative processes and the safeguarding of citizens’ constitutional rights.
Also read: Court adjourns Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan’s case to March 2025
With the hearing adjourned, the outcome of this contentious issue remains uncertain, but it has undoubtedly highlighted deep concerns about fairness and transparency in the country’s political system.
